Perfil taxonómico: Bubalus bubalis arnee (Kerr 1792)

Bubalus bubalis arnee: Taxonomía y Nomenclatura
Reino:
Animalia
Rango taxonómico:
Subspecies
Sinónimas:
Bubalus arnee
Kerr 1792
Nombres comunes:
Indian water buffalo []
arni []
Estado taxonómico:
Situación actual:
valid
Indicadores de calidad de datos:
Récord de calificación de credibilidad:
TWG standards met
Bubalus bubalis arnee: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Reino : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
subreino : Bilateria
Infrareino : Deuterostomia
Filo : Chordata
chordates |
cordado |
cordés |
subfilo : Vertebrata
vertebrates |
vertebrado |
vertébrés |
Infradivisión : Gnathostomata
superclase : Tetrapoda
Clase : Mammalia
mammals |
mamífero |
mammifères |
subclase : Theria
Infraclase : Eutheria
Ordenar : Artiodactyla
cloven-hoofed ungulates |
even-toed ungulates |
porco do mato |
veado |
artiodactyls |
Familia : Bovidae
bovids |
antelopes |
cattle |
goats |
sheep |
Subfamilia : Bovinae
Género : Bubalus
water buffalos |
Especies : Bubalus bubalis
water buffalo (feral) |
water buffalo |
Water Buffalo |
domestic water buffalo |
Subespecie : Bubalus bubalis arnee
Indian water buffalo |
arni |
Bubalus bubalis arnee Niños directos:
Bubalus bubalis arnee: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Wilson, Don E., and DeeAnn M. Reeder, eds.
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
2005-10-01 / 2005-10-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed., vols. 1 & 2
Page(s):
2142
Publisher:
Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication Place:
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
ISBN/ISSN:
0-8018-8221-4/
Notes:
Reference for:
Bubalus bubalis arnee
Bubalus bubalis arnee: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Bubalus bubalis arnee: Comments
Comment:
ITIS defers to Wilson & Reeder (eds., 2005) on the correct name for a species when the choice is between an older name based on a domestic form and a younger name based on a wild form. ICZN Opinion 2027 (3/2003) sought to resolve this, but by itself the Ruling contained in that Opinion effectively says that it cannot be based on priority. More explicit guidance is found in the "History of Case 3010" section of the Opinion, but ITIS has been advised that only the Ruling section is binding. Thus, there is apparently no basis upon which to select the correct (valid) name