Perfil taxonómico: Crocidura rapax (G Allen 1923)

Crocidura rapax: Taxonomía y Nomenclatura
Reino:
Animalia
Rango taxonómico:
Species
Sinónimas:
Nombres comunes:
Chinese White-toothed Shrew []
Estado taxonómico:
Situación actual:
valid
Indicadores de calidad de datos:
Récord de calificación de credibilidad:
TWG standards met
Crocidura rapax: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Reino : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
subreino : Bilateria
Infrareino : Deuterostomia
Filo : Chordata
chordates |
cordado |
cordés |
subfilo : Vertebrata
vertebrates |
vertebrado |
vertébrés |
Infradivisión : Gnathostomata
superclase : Tetrapoda
Clase : Mammalia
mammals |
mamífero |
mammifères |
subclase : Theria
Infraclase : Eutheria
Ordenar : Soricomorpha
Familia : Soricidae
shrews |
Subfamilia : Crocidurinae
white-toothed shrews |
Género : Crocidura
Especies : Crocidura rapax
Chinese White-toothed Shrew |
Crocidura rapax Niños directos:
Crocidura rapax kurodai
(Jameson and Jones 1977)
Crocidura rapax lutaoensis
(Fang and Lee 2002)
Crocidura rapax rapax
(G Allen 1923)
Crocidura rapax tadae
(Tokuda and Kano 1936)
Crocidura rapax: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Wilson, Don E., and DeeAnn M. Reeder, eds.
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
2005-10-01 / 2005-10-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed., vols. 1 & 2
Page(s):
2142
Publisher:
Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication Place:
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
ISBN/ISSN:
0-8018-8221-4/
Notes:
Reference for:
Crocidura rapax
Crocidura rapax: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Crocidura rapax: Comments
Comment:
Comments: Formerly included in russula or pullata, but see Jiang and Hoffmann (2001). Fang et al. (1997) retained kurodai as a separate species, but did not study rapax. Fang and Lee (2002) demonstrated that allopatric populations from Taiwan (kurodai), Orchid Isl (tadae) and Green Isl (lutaoensis) share the same karyotype (2n = 40, FN = 54 or 64), but differ in size and morphology and should therefore be considered as valid subspecies