Perfil taxonómico: Leptacis coorgensis (Mukerjee 1981)

Leptacis coorgensis: Taxonomía y Nomenclatura
Reino:
Animalia
Rango taxonómico:
Species
Sinónimas:
Nombres comunes:
Estado taxonómico:
Situación actual:
valid
Indicadores de calidad de datos:
Récord de calificación de credibilidad:
Minimum taxonomic/nomenclature review
Leptacis coorgensis: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Reino : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
subreino : Bilateria
Infrareino : Protostomia
Superdivisión : Ecdysozoa
Filo : Arthropoda
arthropods |
Artrópode |
arthropodes |
subfilo : Hexapoda
hexapods |
Clase : Insecta
insects |
hexapoda |
inseto |
insectes |
subclase : Pterygota
winged insects |
insects ailés |
Infraclase : Neoptera
modern, wing-folding insects |
superorden : Holometabola
Ordenar : Hymenoptera
abelha |
formiga |
vespa |
ants |
bees |
wasps |
Suborden : Apocrita
narrow-waisted hymenopterans |
ants |
bees |
true wasps |
abeilles |
fourmis |
guêpes véritables |
Infraorden : Terebrantes
superfamilia : Platygastroidea
Familia : Platygastridae
platygastrids |
Subfamilia : Platygastrinae
Género : Leptacis
Leptacis coorgensis Niños directos:
Leptacis coorgensis: References
Expert(s):
Expert:
Norman F. Johnson
Notes:
Department of Entomology, Museum of Biological Diversity, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212
Reference for:
Leptacis coorgensis
Source(s):
Source:
Hymenoptera Name Server - 10-Oct-2007
Acquired:
2007-10-10
Notes:
http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu:210/hymenoptera/nomenclator.home_page
Reference for:
Leptacis coorgensis
Publication(s):
Leptacis coorgensis: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Leptacis coorgensis: Comments
Comment:
Unresolved secondary homonymy exists between Leptacis coorgensis (Mukerjee, 1981) (originally described in Fidiobia) and Leptacis coorgensis Mukerjee, 1981 (still in its original genus). These were both described in the same publication, and the former was moved into Leptacis in 1989 without noting the homonymy. A replacement name will need to be published by someone to resolve this, as neither name has any available junior synononyms, and they are of equal priority (Johnson, in litt., 10/2007)