Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. 2014. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 19 Nov 2014
Reference for:
Nephrophyceae
Source:
ITIS & Species 2000 Catalogue of Life Management Hierarchy, 2014
Acquired:
2014-11-25
Notes:
M. Ruggiero & D. Gordon, eds. 2014. Consensus Management Hierarchy for the ITIS & Species2000 Catalogue of Life. Contributors: Nicolas Bailly, Thierry Bourgoin, Richard Brusca, Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Daphne Fautin, Dennis Gordon, Gerald Guala, Michael Guiry, Paul Kirk, Elliot Lefkowitz, David Mabberly, David Maddison, Alan Paton, Michael Ruggiero, Peter Stevens, and Brian Tyndall
Reference for:
Nephrophyceae
Source:
ICNafp (International Code of Nomenclature [...] Melbourne Code)
Acquired:
2014-12-01
Notes:
McNeill et al. 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Published as Regnum Vegetabile 154. Koeltz Scientific Books. ISBN 978-3-87429-425-6, and available online at http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/
Reference for:
Nephrophyceae
Publication(s):
Nephrophyceae: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Nephrophyceae: Comments
Comment:
Ruggiero et al. (2014) have followed the stance that Article 16.4 of McNeill et al. (2012) allows for the omission of the word element -selmid- as it is 'the genitive singular stem of the second part of a name of an included genus' (namely type genus Nephroselmis), and the name is above the rank of order. This view would mean Nephrophyceae is the correct name for the class. Others could read the Article as a restrictive list of word elements that can be excluded, and since -selmid- is not listed, that interpretation would mean Nephroselmidophyceae would be the corrected name for the class