Taxonomy Profile: Borostomias mononema (Regan and Trewavas 1929)

Borostomias mononema: Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Animalia
Taxonomic Rank:
Species
Synonym(s):
Diplolychnus mononema
Regan and Trewavas 1929
Common Name(s):
Taxonomic Status:
Current Standing:
valid
Data Quality Indicators:
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Borostomias mononema: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
Subkingdom : Bilateria
Infrakingdom : Deuterostomia
Phylum : Chordata
chordates |
cordado |
cordés |
Subphylum : Vertebrata
vertebrates |
vertebrado |
vertébrés |
Infradivision : Gnathostomata
Superclass : Actinopterygii
ray-finned fishes |
spiny rayed fishes |
poisson épineux |
poissons à nageoires rayonnées |
Class : Teleostei
Superorder : Stenopterygii
Order : Stomiiformes
Suborder : Photichthyoidei
Family : Stomiidae
dragonfishes |
scaly dragonfishes |
barbeled dragonfishes |
dragons à écailles |
peces demonios |
Subfamily : Astronesthinae
snaggletooths |
stareaters |
Genus : Borostomias
Borostomias mononema Direct Children(s):
Borostomias mononema: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Source:
Catalog of Fishes, 08-Nov-2004
Acquired:
2004-11-10
Notes:
http://www.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/
Reference for:
Borostomias mononema
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Harold, A. S. / Carpenter, Kent E., and Volker H. Niem, eds.
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
1999-01-01 / 1999-01-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Astronesthidae: Snaggletooths (stareaters)
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes: The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific, vol. 3: Batoid fishes, chimaeras and Bony fishes, part 1 (Elopidae to Linophrynidae)
Page(s):
1905-1906
Publisher:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Publication Place:
Rome, Italy
ISBN/ISSN:
92-5-104302-7/1020-6868
Notes:
Reference for:
Borostomias mononema
Borostomias mononema: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Indo-West Pacific
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Borostomias mononema: Comments