Taxonomy Profile: Lithodes aequispinus (J E Benedict 1895)

Lithodes aequispinus: Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Animalia
Taxonomic Rank:
Species
Synonym(s):
Lithodes aequispina
Benedict 1894
Common Name(s):
golden king crab []
Taxonomic Status:
Current Standing:
valid
Data Quality Indicators:
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Lithodes aequispinus: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
Subkingdom : Bilateria
Infrakingdom : Protostomia
Superdivision : Ecdysozoa
Phylum : Arthropoda
arthropods |
Artrópode |
arthropodes |
Subphylum : Crustacea
crustaceans |
crustáceo |
crustacés |
Class : Malacostraca
Subclass : Eumalacostraca
Superorder : Eucarida
camarão |
caranguejo |
ermitão |
lagosta |
siri |
Order : Decapoda
crabs |
crayfishes |
lobsters |
prawns |
shrimp |
crabes |
crevettes |
écrevisses |
homards |
Suborder : Pleocyemata
Infraorder : Anomura
Superfamily : Paguroidea
Family : Lithodidae
stone and king crabs |
Genus : Lithodes
Species : Lithodes aequispinus
golden king crab |
Lithodes aequispinus Direct Children(s):
Lithodes aequispinus: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Source:
American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31
Acquired:
2004-05-18
Notes:
McLaughlin et al. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31
Reference for:
Lithodes aequispinus
Publication(s):
Lithodes aequispinus: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Lithodes aequispinus: Comments
Comment:
McLaughlin et al. (2005) Occurrence values: P
Comment:
McLaughlin et al. (2005) note: "This species was incorrectly cited as Lithodes aequispina in the first edition, as was the date of publication as 1894. Although J. E. Benedict, 1895, Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 17(1016):481, erred in assigning a masculine ending to a feminine noun ("spina"), there is no indication that this was an inadvertent error Therefore, according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 1999:32.5, it is not an original misspelling that must be corrected. The preprint of Benedict's paper, while appearing with the cover date of 1894, was actually published on January 29, 1895 (Anonymous, 1947, U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 193:82)."