Taxonomy Profile: Navicula lanceolata (Agardh Kützing)

Navicula lanceolata: Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Chromista
Taxonomic Rank:
Species
Synonym(s):
Common Name(s):
Taxonomic Status:
Current Standing:
accepted
Data Quality Indicators:
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Navicula lanceolata: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom : Chromista
Subkingdom : Harosa
Infrakingdom : Halvaria
Superdivision : Heterokonta
Phylum : Ochrophyta
Class : Bacillariophyceae
diatoms |
diatomées |
Order : Naviculales
Family : Naviculaceae
Genus : Navicula
Navicula lanceolata Direct Children(s):
Navicula lanceolata var. tenella
(Schmidt in Schmidt et al Cleve)
Navicula lanceolata: References
Expert(s):
Expert:
J. Patrick Kociolek
Notes:
Executive Director, California Academy of Sciences
Reference for:
Navicula lanceolata
Expert:
Russell G. Kreis, Jr.
Notes:
USEPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, 9311 Groh Road, Grosse Ile, Michigan 48138
Reference for:
Navicula lanceolata
Source(s):
Source:
NODC Taxonomic Code
Acquired:
1996-07-29
Notes:
Reference for:
Navicula lanceolata
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Stoermer, E. F., R. G. Kreis, Jr., and N. A. Andresen
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
1999-01-01 / 1999-01-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Checklist of Diatoms from the Laurentian Great Lakes, II
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol. 25, no. 3
Page(s):
515-566
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/
Notes:
Reference for:
Navicula lanceolata
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Economou-Amilli, Athena, Josef Elster, and Jirí Komárek
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
1998-01-01 / 1998-01-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Summer phytoplankton composition in transect from Weddell Sea to La Plata
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Polish Polar Research, vol. 19, no. 3-4
Page(s):
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/0138-0338
Notes:
available online at http://polar.pan.pl/ppr19/1998-3-4_187-204.pdf
Reference for:
Navicula lanceolata
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Chessman, Bruce C., Nina Bate, Peter A. Gell, and Peter Newall
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
2007-01-01 / 2007-01-01
Article/Chapter Title:
A diatom species index for bioassessment of Australian rivers
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Marine and Freshwater Research, vol. 58, no. 6
Page(s):
542-557
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/1323-1650
Notes:
doi: 10.1071/MF06220
Reference for:
Navicula lanceolata
Navicula lanceolata: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Australia
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Navicula lanceolata: Comments
Comment:
Stoermer, E. G., R. G. Kreis, Jr. and N. A. Andresen in J. Great Lakes Res. 25(3):515-566: Lange-Bertalot (1980) demonstrated Navicula lanceolata sensu Agardh, Navicula lanceolata Agardh sensu Kütz. Navicula lanceolata Agardh sensu Ehrenb. and Navicula lanceolata Agardh sensu Hust. to be three different species. Navicula lanceolata (C.Agardh) Ehrenb. = Navicula lanceolata(C.Agardh) Ehrenb. Navicula lanceolata (C.Agardh) Kütz. = Navicula trivialis Lange-Bert. Navicula lanceolata (C.Agardh) Kutz. sensu Hust. = Navicula pseudolanceolata Lange-Bert. We could assume the majority of Navicula lanceolata records were identified with either Hustedt (1930) or Patrick and Reimer (1966) which presents problems. Both authors cite (C.Agardh) Kütz. as the authority for the taxon. Patrick states having examined the Agardh type and established a lectotype (Agardh Herb. Lund No. 3401 Frustulia lanceolata Ge.B.A. +4) then gives Kützing as the authority. Adopting the synonymy of Lange-Bertalot (1980)would result in the following: If Hustedt 1930 was used to identify a specimen the synonymy is: Navicula lanceolata (C.Agardh) Kütz. = Navicula pseudolanceolata Lange-Bert. If Patrick and Reimer (1966) was used to identify a specimen the synonymy is: Navicula lanceolata (C.Agardh) Kütz. = Navicula trivialis Lange-Bert. This is unsettling as Patrick in Patrick and Reimer (1966) clearly indicates Pl. 48, fig. 20 as a drawing of the Lectotype. This would mean identifications made using Patrick and Reimer (1966) and citing Pl. 48, fig. 20 represent the Agardh type and should not be considered Navicula trivialis Lange-Bert. which would be the case if one were to just do 'paper taxonomy'