Taxonomy Profile: Neanotis hohenackeri (P Daniel & Vajr)

Neanotis hohenackeri: Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Plantae
Taxonomic Rank:
Species
Synonym(s):
Hedyotis foetida
Dalzell
Neanotis foetida
Hook f WH Lewis
Anotis foetida
Dalzell Hook f
Neanotis hohenackerii
P Daniel & Vajr
Common Name(s):
Taxonomic Status:
Current Standing:
accepted
Data Quality Indicators:
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Neanotis hohenackeri: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom : Plantae
plants |
Planta |
Vegetal |
plantes |
Subkingdom : Viridiplantae
green plants |
Infrakingdom : Streptophyta
land plants |
Superdivision : Embryophyta
Phylum : Tracheophyta
vascular plants |
tracheophytes |
Subphylum : Spermatophytina
spermatophytes |
seed plants |
phanérogames |
Superorder : Asteranae
Order : Gentianales
Family : Rubiaceae
madders |
rubiacées |
Genus : Neanotis
Neanotis hohenackeri Direct Children(s):
Neanotis hohenackeri: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Daniel, P., and E. Vajravelu
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
1982-10-01 / 1982-10-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Name changes in some South Indian flowering plants
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, vol. 3, no. 2
Page(s):
675-676
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/2050-9768
Notes:
Reference for:
Neanotis hohenackeri
Neanotis hohenackeri: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Southern Asia
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Neanotis hohenackeri: Comments
Comment:
Originally spelled -erii, which is treated as a correctable error and changed to -eri under ICBN Rec. 60C.1. See also comments under Neanotis foetida, Anotis foetida and Hedyotis foetida on why each of those is illegitimate. Neanotis hohenackeri P. Daniel & Vajr. is currently the correct name for the taxon unless H. subtilis Miq. (not mentioned by those authors, or Lewis) is included as a heterotypic synonym, in which case a new combination ('Neanotis subtilis') would have to be published based on Miquel's name. This synonymy appears not to have been asserted or refuted in any recent publication, though it seems likely based on type localities alone