Perfil taxonómico: Amphora submontana (Hust)

Amphora submontana: Taxonomía y Nomenclatura
Reino:
Chromista
Rango taxonómico:
Species
Sinónimas:
Nombres comunes:
Estado taxonómico:
Situación actual:
accepted
Indicadores de calidad de datos:
Récord de calificación de credibilidad:
TWG standards met
Amphora submontana: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Reino : Chromista
subreino : Harosa
Infrareino : Halvaria
Superdivisión : Heterokonta
Filo : Ochrophyta
Clase : Bacillariophyceae
diatoms |
diatomées |
Familia : Catenulaceae
Género : Amphora
Amphora submontana Niños directos:
Amphora submontana: References
Expert(s):
Expert:
J. Patrick Kociolek
Notes:
Executive Director, California Academy of Sciences
Reference for:
Amphora submontana
Expert:
Russell G. Kreis, Jr.
Notes:
USEPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, 9311 Groh Road, Grosse Ile, Michigan 48138
Reference for:
Amphora submontana
Source(s):
Source:
NODC Taxonomic Code
Acquired:
1996-07-29
Notes:
Reference for:
Amphora submontana
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Stoermer, E. F., R. G. Kreis, Jr., and N. A. Andresen
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
1999-01-01 / 1999-01-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Checklist of Diatoms from the Laurentian Great Lakes, II
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol. 25, no. 3
Page(s):
515-566
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/
Notes:
Reference for:
Amphora submontana
Amphora submontana: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
North America
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Amphora submontana: Comments
Comment:
Stoermer, E. G., R. G. Kreis, Jr. and N. A. Andresen in J. Great Lakes Res. 25(3):515-566: Krammer and Lange-Bertalot (1985) propose Amphora submontana Hust. as asynonym of Amphora montana and cite their synonymy decision in 1986. Simonsen (1987) claims the wrong slide (i.e. specimen) was used for the decision. Lange-Bertalot and Krammer (1987) acknowledge the correct Hustedt type and maintain their synonymy. The resolution of this problem requires careful examination of the Hustedt and Krasske types along with other collections to determine the variablity existing within the taxa to determine whether there are two distinct taxa or one taxon with a degree of variability