Perfil taxonómico: Genysa decorsei (Simon 1902)

Genysa decorsei: Taxonomía y Nomenclatura
Reino:
Animalia
Rango taxonómico:
Species
Sinónimas:
Diadocyrtus decorsei
Simon 1902
Nombres comunes:
Estado taxonómico:
Situación actual:
valid
Indicadores de calidad de datos:
Récord de calificación de credibilidad:
Minimum taxonomic/nomenclature review
Genysa decorsei: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Reino : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
subreino : Bilateria
Infrareino : Protostomia
Superdivisión : Ecdysozoa
Filo : Arthropoda
arthropods |
Artrópode |
arthropodes |
subfilo : Chelicerata
cheliceriformes |
quelicerado |
queliceriforme |
subclase : Arachnida
araignées |
aracnídeo |
arachnids |
arácnidos |
Ordenar : Araneae
spiders |
aranhas |
araignées |
arañas |
Familia : Idiopidae
armored trapdoor spiders |
Género : Genysa
Especies : Genysa decorsei
Genysa decorsei Niños directos:
Genysa decorsei: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Source:
World Spider Catalog, Version 11.0
Acquired:
2011-10-15
Notes:
Platnick, Norman I. 2011. The World Spider Catalog, v.11.0. American Museum of Natural History. Database built by Robert J. Raven from the files underlying the website at http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/ DOI: 10.5531/db.iz.0001
Reference for:
Genysa decorsei
Source:
World Spider Catalog, Version 12.5
Acquired:
2012-04-15
Notes:
Platnick, Norman I. 2012. The World Spider Catalog, v.12.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/ DOI: 10.5531/db.iz.0001
Reference for:
Genysa decorsei
Publication(s):
Genysa decorsei: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Africa
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Genysa decorsei: Comments
Comment:
Unresolved secondary homonymy is shown by Platnick (2012, online World Spider Catalog v12.5): In the same work, Simon (1902) described Diadocyrtus decoursei (p.596) and Genysochoera decoursei (p.597). These are both currently placed in the genus Genysa (per Platnick, online World Spider Catalog v12.5), with a note on the latter saying 'if actually congeneric, and not conspecific, with the above species, a replacement name will be necessary.' These secondary homonyms have identical priority under the ICZN, and their status apparently remains unresolved