Perfil taxonómico: Graomys centralis (Thomas 1902)

Graomys centralis: Taxonomía y Nomenclatura
Reino:
Animalia
Rango taxonómico:
Species
Sinónimas:
Nombres comunes:
Central Pericote []
Estado taxonómico:
Situación actual:
valid
Indicadores de calidad de datos:
Récord de calificación de credibilidad:
TWG standards met
Graomys centralis: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Reino : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
subreino : Bilateria
Infrareino : Deuterostomia
Filo : Chordata
chordates |
cordado |
cordés |
subfilo : Vertebrata
vertebrates |
vertebrado |
vertébrés |
Infradivisión : Gnathostomata
superclase : Tetrapoda
Clase : Mammalia
mammals |
mamífero |
mammifères |
subclase : Theria
Infraclase : Eutheria
Ordenar : Rodentia
rodents |
esquilo |
preá |
rato |
roedor |
rongeurs |
Suborden : Myomorpha
Mice |
Rats |
Rats |
souris |
Voles |
Gerbils |
Hamsters |
Lemmings |
superfamilia : Muroidea
Familia : Cricetidae
Subfamilia : Sigmodontinae
New World rats |
New World mice |
Género : Graomys
Leaf-eared Mice |
Especies : Graomys centralis
Central Pericote |
Graomys centralis Niños directos:
Graomys centralis: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Musser, Guy G., and Michael D. Carleton / Wilson, Don E., and DeeAnn M. Reeder, eds.
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
2005-10-01 / 2005-10-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Superfamily Muroidea
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed., vol. 2
Page(s):
894-1531
Publisher:
Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication Place:
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
ISBN/ISSN:
0-8018-8221-4/
Notes:
Reference for:
Graomys centralis
Graomys centralis: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
South America
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Graomys centralis: Comments
Comment:
Comments: Described as a subspecies of griseoflavus and early recognized at that rank (Cabrera, 1961; Ellerman, 1941; Gyldenstolpe, 1932); later merged as a full synonym of Phyllotis g. griseoflavus by Hershkovitz (1962). Substantial divergence in allozymes, genomic content, and karyotypes, together with laboratory breeding results, collectively supports the specific status of populations referrable to centralis (Ramírez et al., 2001; Theiler and Blanco, 1996; Theiler and Gardenal, 1994; Theiler et a...