Taxonomy Profile: Buethobius coniugans (Chamberlin 1911)

Buethobius coniugans: Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Animalia
Taxonomic Rank:
Species
Synonym(s):
Buethobius conjugans
Chamberlin 1911
Common Name(s):
Taxonomic Status:
Current Standing:
valid
Data Quality Indicators:
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Buethobius coniugans: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
Subkingdom : Bilateria
Infrakingdom : Protostomia
Superdivision : Ecdysozoa
Phylum : Arthropoda
arthropods |
Artrópode |
arthropodes |
Subphylum : Myriapoda
miriápode |
myriapods |
Class : Chilopoda
centipedes |
centopéia |
quilópode |
centipeds |
Family : Henicopidae
Subfamily : Anopsobiinae
Genus : Buethobius
Buethobius coniugans Direct Children(s):
Buethobius coniugans: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Publication(s):
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Shear, William A.
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
2018-05-23 / 2018-05-23
Article/Chapter Title:
The centipede family Anopsobiidae new to North America, with the description of a new genus and species and notes on the Henicopidae of North America and the Anopsobiidae of the Northern Hemisphere (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha)
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
Zootaxa, vol. 4422, no. 2
Page(s):
259-283
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/1175-5326
Notes:
doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4422.2.6
Reference for:
Buethobius coniugans
Author(s)/Editor(s):
Chamberlin, Ralph V.
Publication Date (Listed/Actual):
1911-11-01 / 1911-11-01
Article/Chapter Title:
Some Lithobiomorpha from the region of San Francisco Bay
Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.:
The Canadian Entomologist, vol. 43, no. 11
Page(s):
378-385
Publisher:
Publication Place:
ISBN/ISSN:
/
Notes:
Available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27832754
Reference for:
Buethobius coniugans
Buethobius coniugans: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
North America
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Continental US / Native
Buethobius coniugans: Comments
Comment:
Although the epithet is commonly misspelled 'conjugans', Chamberlin consistently spelled it 'coniugans' in the original publication (pp. 378, 384) and in subsequent works. Shear (2018:269) correctly lists the original spelling