Taxonomy Profile: Svetovidovia (Cohen 1973)

Svetovidovia: Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Animalia
Taxonomic Rank:
Genus
Synonym(s):
Common Name(s):
Taxonomic Status:
Current Standing:
valid
Data Quality Indicators:
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Svetovidovia: Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom : Animalia
animals |
Animal |
animaux |
Subkingdom : Bilateria
Infrakingdom : Deuterostomia
Phylum : Chordata
chordates |
cordado |
cordés |
Subphylum : Vertebrata
vertebrates |
vertebrado |
vertébrés |
Infradivision : Gnathostomata
Superclass : Actinopterygii
ray-finned fishes |
spiny rayed fishes |
poisson épineux |
poissons à nageoires rayonnées |
Class : Teleostei
Superorder : Paracanthopterygii
Order : Gadiformes
cods |
hakes |
merlus |
morues |
grenadiers |
gadiforms |
Family : Moridae
codlings |
deepsea codfishes |
moras |
morid cods |
carboneros |
moros |
moras |
moras y carboneros |
Genus : Svetovidovia
Svetovidovia Direct Children(s):
Svetovidovia lucullus
(Jensen in Koefoed 1953)
Svetovidovia: References
Expert(s):
Source(s):
Source:
Catalog of Fishes, 10-Nov-2004
Acquired:
2004-11-10
Notes:
http://www.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/
Reference for:
Svetovidovia
Publication(s):
Svetovidovia: Geographic Information
Geographic Division:
Jurisdiction/Origin:
Svetovidovia: Comments
Comment:
In the online Catalog of Fishes (2004), Eschmeyer treats the species Svetovidovia lucullus as valid, but notes that the status of the genus is uncertain. Some authors have treated it as valid, others have it as "questionably a synonym of Laemonema". Additionally, under the entry for Gargilius, Eschmeyer notes the following, "Type by subsequent designation. Type designated by Cohen 1973:326 [ref. 6589], but that designation invalid as genus established after 1930 without type fixation. Appeared first without description in Jensen in Schmidt 1906:177 and Holt & Byrne 1908:58 [ref. 6487]. Preccupied by Gargilius Faimaire 1891 in Insecta, replaced by Svetovidovia Cohen 1973, but since Gargilius was not available it cannot be replaced; Svetovidovia stands on its own with type by original designation (also monotypic). Questionably a synonym of Laemonema Günther 1862 -- (Meléndez C. & Markle 1997:624 [ref. 23369])"